The HPC for its part is now actively mystifying the true state of affairs, where it can, hiding the fact of Department of Health/government involvement and implying that its own statutory constitution by order of the Privy Council (HPO2001) means it is offering the psy field statutory as opposed to state regulation. Its Chief Executive has recently disingenuously consigned the term state regulation to the HPC’s now defunct predecessor, the CPSM (Council for Professions Supplementary to Medicine), as if through a smart stroke of semantic conjuring the bothersome reality of state regulation could be airbrushed out of the picture. The government has quite clearly charged the HPC with regulating the psy field on its behalf, a coercive act that both the HPC and government would prefer to downplay, with its implementation two years away at the earliest giving time for resistance to develop.
In contradistinction to above lets call a spade a spade and speak of state regulation, without forked tongue.
| MARCH 27TH 2009 | LEGAL | ARCHIVE | IPN | CONTACT | HOME | CONTENTS......... | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||

THE INTERMINABLE TERMINOLOGICAL CONFUSION OF
STATUTORY AND STATE REGULATION
Guy Gladstone
see also: THE FIVE MEANINGS OF STATUTORY REGULATION